Current:Home > MarketsFederal judge blocks Montana's TikTok ban before it takes effect -MarketStream
Federal judge blocks Montana's TikTok ban before it takes effect
View
Date:2025-04-23 14:41:51
A federal judge has blocked a law in Montana that sought to ban TikTok across the state, delivering a blow to an unprecedented attempt to completely restrict a single app within a state's borders.
The ruling, which came on Thursday, means that Montana's TikTok ban, which was set to go into effect on Jan. 1, has now been halted.
TikTok, which has more than 150 million American users, has for years been under intense scrutiny over fears that its Beijing-based parent company, ByteDance, would hand over sensitive user data to Chinese authorities, or that Beijing would use the app as a propaganda tool — even though there is no public proof that either has ever happened.
Although several states and the federal government have prohibited the app from being downloaded on government devices, Montana was the first state to pass an outright ban of the app. Some critics have accused it of government overreach.
In May, TikTok sued the state over the law, arguing that it amounts to an illegal suppression of free speech. Lawyers for TikTok argued that the national security threat raised by officials in Montana was never supported by solid evidence.
U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy, the judge overseeing the case, was skeptical of the ban in an October hearing on the lawsuit. He pointed out that TikTok users voluntarily provide their personal data, despite state officials suggesting the app was stealing the data of users. He said state officials justified the Montana ban under a "paternalistic argument."
As Washington continues to debate TikTok's future, states have been acting faster, and the law in Montana was considered an important test case of whether a state-level ban of the app would survive court challenges.
Backing the Montana law were 18 mostly Republican-led states that were eyeing similar bans of TikTok. Aside from the legal hurdles to implementing such laws, cybersecurity experts have raised questions about how, from a technical standpoint, such a ban would even be possible.
President Trump clamped down on TikTok and attempted to outlaw the app, but his efforts were twice struck down in the courts.
National security experts say TikTok is caught in the middle of escalating geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China, as Washington grows ever more concerned about the advancement of Chinese tech, like semiconductors, and the country's investments in artificial intelligence.
Supporters of restricting or banning TikTok in the U.S. point to Chinese national security laws that compel private companies to turn information over to Beijing authorities.
They also point to ByteDance, TikTok's corporate owner. It admitted in December that it had fired four employees, two of whom worked in China, who had improperly accessed data on two journalists in an attempt to identify a company employee who leaked a damaging internal report.
TikTok says China-based employees no longer have access to U.S. user data under a new firewall it has put in place with the help of Texas-based software giant Oracle. The planned, dubbed Project Texas, stores all Americans' data on served owned and maintained by Oracle, with additional oversight from independent auditors.
Still, China hawks say anything short of ByteDance selling TikTok to an American company will not assuage national security concerns.
Recently, national security officials in Washington resumed trying to reach a deal with TikTok to keep the app operational in the U.S.
veryGood! (6453)
Related
- From family road trips to travel woes: Americans are navigating skyrocketing holiday costs
- Afghan evacuee child with terminal illness dies while in federal U.S. custody
- With Wild and Dangerous Weather All Around, Republicans Stay Silent on Climate Change
- Far More Methane Leaking at Oil, Gas Sites in Pennsylvania than Reported
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- India's population passes 1.4 billion — and that's not a bad thing
- Britney Spears Shares Update on Relationship With Mom Lynne After 3-Year Reunion
- Gas stoves pollute homes with benzene, which is linked to cancer
- Behind on your annual reading goal? Books under 200 pages to read before 2024 ends
- Paul-Henri Nargeolet's stepson shares memories of French explorer lost in OceanGate sub tragedy
Ranking
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- Far More Methane Leaking at Oil, Gas Sites in Pennsylvania than Reported
- Get 2 Peter Thomas Roth Anti-Aging Cleansing Gels for Less Than the Price of 1
- For many, a 'natural death' may be preferable to enduring CPR
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Opioid settlement payouts are now public — and we know how much local governments got
- Biden hosts India's Modi for state visit, navigating critical relationship amid human rights concerns
- Years before Titanic sub went missing, OceanGate was warned about catastrophic safety issues
Recommendation
Why members of two of EPA's influential science advisory committees were let go
Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $300 Crossbody Bag for Just $69
Shawn Mendes and Camila Cabello Make Our Wildest Dreams Come True at Taylor Swift's Eras Tour
Worst Case Climate Scenario Might Be (Slightly) Less Dire Than Thought
The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
Corporate Giants Commit to Emissions Targets Based on Science
More Than $3.4 Trillion in Assets Vow to Divest From Fossil Fuels
Along the North Carolina Coast, Small Towns Wrestle With Resilience